Firstly, Zhuo Ming’s did not clearly indicate which article he is summarizing on. So I am going to assume that he is using Article 3: Copenhagen needs a strong lead negotiator as his reference. Zhuo Ming did a bad job in summarizing as he did not include the important details which a summary should have. In this article, the main points should be the actions and experiences faced by Kyoto chair Raul Estrada-Oyuela.
Next, the summary contains a number of spelling and grammatical errors. Zhuo Ming should spend more time on the usage of certain words, such as “explodes” in paragraph 2. It can be observed clearly that some of the words are not used appropriately in his summary. In addition, Zhuo Ming should use more connective words and expressions to link his summary to make the sentences relate to one another smoothly.
In conclusion, I would like to advise Zhuo Ming to read the article a few times, get an idea on what the article is about and list out the main points before attempting to summarize it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment